The VR School
Financial LiteracyGive
Enroll
GOV
All Courses
AP ExamUC A-G · Section AUC Honors · +1.0 GPAMay 2026

AP US Government
and Politics

Democracy · Power · Rights

The most comprehensive agentic AP US Government course. From the Constitution to SCOTUS cases to the Argument Essay — master every FRQ type, all 15 required cases, and score a 5 — guided by Prof. Marcus Webb and SofAI.

Start with Prof. Marcus
AP Resources
5
Score Target
Quick LinksCollegeBoard AP Gov VRS AP Resources AP Seminar Exemplar ↗
Exam: May 2026
Exam Blueprint

Two Sections · MC + 4 FRQ Types

🔵

Multiple Choice

Section I · Stimulus-Based
50%80 min55 questions
  • › Every question is stimulus-based: primary sources, data, maps, or political cartoons
  • › Tests all 5 units — constitutional foundations through political participation
  • › ~60% application and analysis; ~40% factual recall

Score 5 Tip: Practice reading primary source excerpts quickly. The MC section uses Founders' writings, SCOTUS opinions, and polling data — you need to connect the stimulus to course concepts in under 90 seconds per question.

🟢

Concept Application FRQ

Section II · FRQ 1
~15%100 min (shared)3 points total
  • › Presents a real-world political scenario (e.g., a new law, a presidential action)
  • › Three parts: describe a concept, explain how it applies, explain another perspective or consequence
  • › Most students lose points by being too vague — specific examples are required

Score 5 Tip: For every part, name the concept explicitly, define it in one sentence, and then directly connect it to the scenario. Avoid circular reasoning — explain WHY the concept applies, not just THAT it does.

🟠

Quantitative Analysis FRQ

Section II · FRQ 2
~20%100 min (shared)4 points total
  • › Provides a data set, graph, map, or infographic to analyze
  • › Four parts: describe data, draw a conclusion, explain a pattern, connect to a course concept
  • › Data may show voting trends, public opinion polls, turnout rates, or demographic patterns

Score 5 Tip: Describe data with specific numbers from the graph — graders want precision. Say '63% of Democrats supported X versus 22% of Republicans' not 'Democrats supported it more.' Then connect the trend to a political science concept.

🟣

SCOTUS Comparison FRQ

Section II · FRQ 3
~20%100 min (shared)4 points total
  • › Provides a non-required SCOTUS case and asks you to compare it to a required case
  • › Must identify similarities AND differences in facts, reasoning, or ruling
  • › Must explain how the required case's ruling applies to constitutional principles

Score 5 Tip: Know all 15 required SCOTUS cases cold — facts, constitutional issue, ruling, and significance. When comparing, be explicit: 'In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Court ruled X because Y; similarly, in the provided case...' Vague comparisons earn zero points.

Score Distribution (2024)

Where Students Land

~325,000 students take AP US Gov annually — it's one of the most popular AP social science courses, but only 12% score a 5.

5
Extremely Qualified
← Your target12%
4
Well Qualified
23%
3
Qualified
25%
2
Possibly Qualified
23%
1
No Recommendation
17%

Score 5 Roadmap

Your point targets for the May 2026 exam

🔵

Multiple Choice Target: ≥ 70% (~39 of 55 questions correct)

📋

Concept Application FRQ: 3/3 pts (name concept, apply, explain consequence)

📊

Quantitative Analysis FRQ: 4/4 pts (specific numbers, conclusion, concept connection)

⚖️

SCOTUS Comparison FRQ: 4/4 pts (all 15 required cases memorized cold)

✍️

Argument Essay: 6/6 pts (defensible thesis + foundational documents as evidence)

CollegeBoard CED Aligned

Five AP US Government Units

🏛️
UNIT 115–22%

Foundations of American Democracy

Expand ›

Key Topics

  • Constitutional Convention and compromises (Great Compromise, 3/5 Compromise, Electoral College)
  • Principles of the Constitution: popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism, republicanism
  • Federalism: categorical grants, block grants, unfunded mandates, devolution
  • Brutus #1 vs. Federalist #10 and #51 — competing visions of government

Key Terms

federalism
division of power between national and state governments
separation of powers
constitutional division of authority among legislative, executive, and judicial branches
checks and balances
each branch can limit the power of the others
popular sovereignty
government authority derived from the consent of the governed
enumerated powers
powers explicitly listed in the Constitution (Article I, Section 8)
necessary and proper clause
grants Congress power to make laws needed to carry out enumerated powers (elastic clause)
supremacy clause
establishes federal law as the supreme law of the land (Article VI)
devolution
transferring policy responsibility from federal to state governments
FRQ Practice Prompt

Concept Application practice: Congress passes a law requiring all states to implement a new environmental standard or lose federal highway funding. Using the concept of federalism, describe the constitutional tension this creates. Explain how this relates to the debate between Federalist #51 and Brutus #1. Which argument about centralized power does this scenario most support?

Practice with Prof. Marcus →

Curated Video Lessons

Federalism — AP Government
content

Federalism — AP Government

Khan Academy10 min
Checks and Balances — Crash Course Government
content

Checks and Balances — Crash Course Government

Crash Course10 min
Constitutional Convention — Tom Richey
review

Constitutional Convention — Tom Richey

Tom Richey14 min
⚖️
UNIT 225–36%

Interactions Among Branches of Government

Expand ›

Key Topics

  • Congress: bicameralism, lawmaking process, committee system, filibuster, cloture, incumbency advantage
  • Presidency: formal and informal powers, Executive Orders, veto power, signing statements, bully pulpit
  • Bureaucracy: implementation, rule-making, iron triangles, issue networks, regulatory agencies
  • Federal Courts: judicial review (Marbury v. Madison), precedent (stare decisis), judicial activism vs. restraint

Key Terms

judicial review
power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional (established in Marbury v. Madison)
filibuster
Senate tactic using extended debate to delay or block a vote
executive order
presidential directive carrying force of law without congressional approval
iron triangle
stable policy-making relationship among congressional committees, bureaucratic agencies, and interest groups
cloture
Senate procedure requiring 60 votes to end a filibuster
signing statement
presidential declaration interpreting or questioning a bill at signing
stare decisis
legal principle of following established precedent in court decisions
bureaucratic discretion
flexibility agencies have in implementing and enforcing laws
FRQ Practice Prompt

SCOTUS Comparison practice: The Supreme Court ruled in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that the Court has the power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution. A modern case presents a challenge to an executive agency's rule-making authority. Compare these two cases: how does the principle of judicial review established in Marbury apply? Identify one similarity and one difference in the constitutional issues at stake.

Practice with Prof. Marcus →

Curated Video Lessons

Congress — AP Gov Crash Course
content

Congress — AP Gov Crash Course

Crash Course12 min
Presidential Powers — Khan Academy
content

Presidential Powers — Khan Academy

Khan Academy9 min
The Bureaucracy — Crash Course Government
review

The Bureaucracy — Crash Course Government

Crash Course11 min
⚡
UNIT 313–18%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Expand ›

Key Topics

  • Bill of Rights: 1st Amendment (speech, religion, press, assembly, petition), 4th/5th/6th/8th Amendments (due process)
  • Incorporation doctrine: 14th Amendment applies Bill of Rights to states via selective incorporation
  • Required SCOTUS cases: Engel, Yoder, Tinker, NY Times v. US, Schenck, Gideon, Roe, McDonald, Brown, Shaw v. Reno
  • Civil rights movement: Letter from Birmingham Jail, Voting Rights Act, 14th Amendment equal protection

Key Terms

civil liberties
individual freedoms protected from government interference (e.g., speech, religion)
civil rights
protections ensuring equal treatment under the law regardless of identity
incorporation doctrine
14th Amendment due process applies Bill of Rights protections to state governments
selective incorporation
case-by-case process by which SCOTUS has applied specific Bill of Rights protections to states
due process clause
14th Amendment protection that government cannot deprive life, liberty, or property without fair legal process
equal protection clause
14th Amendment guarantee that states must treat similarly situated people equally
prior restraint
government censorship of expression before publication (generally unconstitutional)
clear and present danger
Schenck test: speech can be limited when it creates an immediate threat (later replaced by Brandenburg test)
FRQ Practice Prompt

SCOTUS Comparison practice: In Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was protected symbolic speech. A school district now bans all political buttons worn by students. Using Tinker as precedent, analyze whether this policy would likely be upheld. Identify the constitutional issue, compare the facts, and predict how the Court would rule and why.

Practice with Prof. Marcus →

Curated Video Lessons

Civil Liberties — AP Gov Overview
content

Civil Liberties — AP Gov Overview

Khan Academy11 min
1st Amendment — Crash Course Government
content

1st Amendment — Crash Course Government

Crash Course10 min
Civil Rights Movement and SCOTUS
advanced

Civil Rights Movement and SCOTUS

Tom Richey13 min
📊
UNIT 410–15%

American Political Ideologies and Beliefs

Expand ›

Key Topics

  • Political socialization: family, peers, media, religion, education, region as agents of socialization
  • Political ideology spectrum: liberal, conservative, libertarian, authoritarian
  • Public opinion and polling: sampling, margin of error, question wording, polling bias
  • Links between ideology and policy preferences on economic, social, and foreign policy issues

Key Terms

political socialization
process by which individuals develop political beliefs and values
political ideology
coherent set of beliefs about the role of government and preferred policies
public opinion
aggregate of individual attitudes about government, policies, and political figures
liberal
favors government action to promote equality; supports social programs and civil rights expansion
conservative
favors limited government in economics; supports traditional values and strong national defense
sampling error (margin of error)
statistical measure of how much poll results may differ from the true population
generational effect
lasting political values shaped by major events experienced during formative years
gender gap
consistent difference in political opinions and party identification between men and women
FRQ Practice Prompt

Quantitative Analysis practice: A poll shows that 72% of voters aged 18–29 support expanding student loan forgiveness programs, while only 31% of voters aged 65+ support the same policy. Describe this trend precisely. Explain what political science concept accounts for this generational difference. Then connect this finding to how party platforms are shaped by age-based coalitions.

Practice with Prof. Marcus →

Curated Video Lessons

Political Ideology — AP Government
content

Political Ideology — AP Government

Khan Academy9 min
Public Opinion and Polling
content

Public Opinion and Polling

Crash Course10 min
Political Socialization — Tom Richey
review

Political Socialization — Tom Richey

Tom Richey8 min
🗳️
UNIT 520–27%

Political Participation

Expand ›

Key Topics

  • Voting behavior: rational choice, retrospective vs. prospective voting, party identification, incumbency
  • Elections: Electoral College, campaign finance (Citizens United v. FEC), primary elections, gerrymandering (Baker v. Carr, Shaw v. Reno)
  • Political parties: two-party system, party realignment, dealignment, third parties
  • Interest groups and PACs: lobbying, electioneering, iron triangles, free rider problem
  • Media: agenda-setting, framing, gatekeeping, media bias, social media's effect on political polarization

Key Terms

Electoral College
constitutional body of electors who formally select the president and vice president
gerrymandering
manipulating electoral district boundaries to favor a political party or group
party realignment
major shift in the coalitions of voters supporting each political party
interest group
organized association that tries to influence government policy on behalf of its members
PAC (Political Action Committee)
organization that raises and spends money to elect or defeat political candidates
agenda-setting
media's power to influence which issues the public considers important
retrospective voting
evaluating incumbents based on their past performance in office
free rider problem
individuals benefit from collective action without contributing to it
FRQ Practice Prompt

Argument Essay practice: Develop and defend a claim in response to this prompt: 'The Electoral College undermines democratic principles and should be replaced with a national popular vote.' Using Federalist #51, the concept of federalism, and Citizens United v. FEC as evidence, construct a well-reasoned argument. Address the strongest counterargument and refute it with specific evidence.

Practice with Prof. Marcus →

Curated Video Lessons

Voting and Voter Turnout — AP Gov
content

Voting and Voter Turnout — AP Gov

Khan Academy10 min
Political Parties — Crash Course Government
content

Political Parties — Crash Course Government

Crash Course11 min
Interest Groups and Lobbying — AP Gov
advanced

Interest Groups and Lobbying — AP Gov

Tom Richey12 min
50% of Total Score

FRQ Mastery Suite

AP Gov's four FRQ types each require a different skill set. The Argument Essay alone is worth 30% of your FRQ score — and it's winnable with the right structure.

FRQ Coach →
📋~15%
Section II · 3 Points

Concept Application

FRQ 1 · Most Approachable · 100 min (shared)

Presents a real-world political scenario — a new law, court decision, or political event. Three parts ask you to: (A) describe a political science concept, (B) explain how the concept applies to the scenario, and (C) explain an impact, consequence, or competing perspective.

Scoring Criteria
· Part A: Accurately describes the named concept (1 pt)
· Part B: Explains how the concept applies to the specific scenario (1 pt)
· Part C: Explains an additional impact, perspective, or consequence (1 pt)
Score 5 Strategy
Name and define the concept in Part A — don't assume the grader knows you know it
Use the word 'because' to force yourself to explain, not just describe
Connect directly to the scenario's specific details — quote or paraphrase the scenario
For Part C, think about: Who else is affected? What happens next? What would critics say?
Three complete sentences (one per part) can earn all 3 points — be precise, not lengthy
Model Opener

[Concept] is defined as [accurate definition]. In the provided scenario, [concept] applies because [specific connection to scenario details]. As a result, [consequence/impact], because [reason].

📊~20%
Section II · 4 Points

Quantitative Analysis

FRQ 2 · Data-Driven · 100 min (shared)

Provides a data set, graph, map, or political cartoon. Four parts typically ask: (A) describe a pattern in the data, (B) draw a conclusion, (C) explain why the pattern exists, and (D) connect the data to a course concept or explain a limitation of the data.

Scoring Criteria
· Part A: Accurately describes data using specific numbers (1 pt)
· Part B: Draws a supported conclusion from the data (1 pt)
· Part C: Explains the cause or mechanism behind the pattern (1 pt)
· Part D: Connects to a course concept OR explains a data limitation (1 pt)
Score 5 Strategy
Always cite specific data points — say '67% of independents' not 'most independents'
Describe the direction AND magnitude of any trend (e.g., 'increased by 22 percentage points')
For Part C, apply political science reasoning — not just common sense
For Part D, connect to a named concept (gerrymandering, incumbency advantage, etc.)
If asked about limitations, think about: sampling bias, question wording, timing of the poll
Model Opener

According to the data, [specific statistic with numbers]. This suggests that [conclusion]. This pattern exists because [political science explanation]. This connects to [concept] because [explicit connection].

⚖️~20%
Section II · 4 Points

SCOTUS Comparison

FRQ 3 · Case Analysis · 100 min (shared)

Provides a non-required SCOTUS case summary. Asks you to: (A) identify the constitutional issue in the provided case, (B) explain how a required case's holding applies, (C) explain a similarity OR difference between the cases, and (D) explain how the non-required case's outcome impacts a political institution or behavior.

Scoring Criteria
· Part A: Correctly identifies the constitutional clause or right at issue (1 pt)
· Part B: Accurately applies the required case's holding (1 pt)
· Part C: Clearly explains a similarity or difference with reasoning (1 pt)
· Part D: Explains impact on a political institution, process, or behavior (1 pt)
Score 5 Strategy
Know ALL 15 required SCOTUS cases: facts, constitutional issue, holding, and significance
When identifying the constitutional issue, name the specific clause or amendment
For Part B, use the formula: 'In [required case], the Court held that [holding]. This applies here because [connection].'
For Part C, be explicit: 'A similarity is... because both cases involved...' Don't just list facts
For Part D, connect to Unit 2 (branches) or Unit 5 (participation) — not just to 'rights'
Model Opener

The constitutional issue in the provided case is [specific clause/amendment]. In [required case], the Court ruled [holding], which applies here because [connection to facts]. A [similarity/difference] is [specific comparison with reasoning]. This ruling impacts [institution/behavior] because [explanation].

✍️~30%
Section II · 6 Points

Argument Essay

FRQ 4 · Highest Stakes · 100 min (shared)

Presents a debatable claim about American government. Must write a multi-paragraph essay that: states a defensible thesis, supports it with specific evidence from foundational documents and course content, addresses a counterargument, and demonstrates complex understanding.

Scoring Criteria
· Thesis: states a defensible, specific claim (1 pt)
· Evidence: uses two pieces of specific evidence from foundational documents or required cases (2 pts)
· Reasoning: explains HOW evidence supports the thesis (1 pt)
· Counterargument: acknowledges and rebuts the opposing view (1 pt)
· Complexity: demonstrates nuance or synthesis across topics (1 pt)
Score 5 Strategy
Write a thesis that takes a SPECIFIC position — vague thesis = zero points
Use foundational documents by name: Federalist #10, #51, Brutus #1, Declaration of Independence
For each piece of evidence, explain WHY it supports your thesis — don't just quote it
Address the counterargument in a dedicated paragraph — show you understand the opposing view
For the complexity point: compare two time periods, connect two different units, or explain a tension
Model Opener

Although [counterargument perspective], [specific thesis claim] because [reason 1] and [reason 2]. [Federalist #X / Brutus #1 / required case] demonstrates [evidence] which supports this claim because [explicit reasoning]. [Second evidence source] further illustrates [supporting point] by showing [connection].

Prof. Marcus Webb's Playbook

Expert Score 5 Tips

⚖️

Know 15 SCOTUS Cases Like the Back of Your Hand

Every required SCOTUS case can appear in the MC, SCOTUS Comparison FRQ, or Argument Essay. For each case, memorize: parties, constitutional issue, ruling, and why it matters. Use flashcards — the cases are only 15, but they're high-frequency.

📜

Master the 7 Foundational Documents

Federalist #10 (factions, pluralism, large republic argument), Federalist #51 (separation of powers, checks and balances), and Brutus #1 (Anti-Federalist critique) are the most tested. Memorize one key quote from each for the Argument Essay.

📊

Use Specific Numbers in Quantitative FRQs

The most common error on the Quantitative Analysis FRQ is describing data without citing specific numbers. Graders award points for precision: '58% of Republicans vs. 22% of Democrats supported X' earns a point; 'Republicans supported it more' does not.

✍️

Write a Thesis That Takes a Real Stance

The Argument Essay thesis must be defensible AND specific. 'The Constitution established important principles' = 0 points. 'Federalism, as described in Federalist #51, strengthens democratic accountability by preventing the concentration of power at any single level' = full thesis credit.

🎯

Connect Every FRQ Answer to Named Concepts

AP Gov graders award points for named political science concepts, not general explanations. Always use terms like 'incumbency advantage,' 'iron triangle,' 'selective incorporation,' or 'agenda-setting.' Define the concept and apply it — this earns points even if the rest of your answer is thin.

Curated for Score 5

Practice Tests & Resources

🏛
OFFICIALFREE

CollegeBoard AP US Government

Official CED, course framework, sample FRQs with scoring guidelines, and AP Classroom practice.

Open resource
📂
OFFICIALFREE

Past AP Gov FRQs (2013–2024)

Every released FRQ with scoring guidelines. Do at least 4 full argument essays and 4 SCOTUS comparison FRQs under timed conditions.

Open resource
🎯
FREE PRACTICEFREE

Khan Academy AP Government

Free AP Gov content organized by unit. Excellent stimulus-based multiple choice practice that mirrors the real exam.

Open resource
📺
VIDEO REVIEWFREE

Crash Course Government & Politics

50-episode series covering every AP Gov topic. Watch at 1.25x for review sessions — clear, concise, and exam-focused.

Open resource
🎥
HIGHLY RECOMMENDEDFREE

Tom Richey AP Government

The #1 AP Gov YouTube channel for FRQ writing strategies. Tom Richey's SCOTUS case videos and Argument Essay walkthroughs are essential.

Open resource
📚
COMPREHENSIVEFREE

Fiveable AP US Government

Complete course review, unit summaries, FRQ practice with worked examples, and live study sessions before the exam.

Open resource
📝
PRACTICE MCQ

Albert.io AP Government

High-quality AP-style stimulus-based MC questions. Best tool for simulating the real exam experience and identifying gaps.

Open resource
AI-Powered Progress

16-Week Score 5 Study Plan

Weeks 1–4

Phase 1: Foundations — Constitution, Federalism, and Branches

  • Read all 7 foundational documents; annotate key arguments
  • Study all 15 required SCOTUS cases: facts, issue, ruling, significance
  • Daily: one AP MC stimulus-based question from AP Classroom
  • FRQ practice: one Concept Application per week (Units 1–2)
Weeks 5–8

Phase 2: Rights, Ideology, and Participation

  • Deep dive into civil liberties cases: Tinker, Schenck, Gideon, Brown, McDonald
  • Master all 5 units of ideology, polling, and political participation concepts
  • FRQ practice: one SCOTUS Comparison FRQ per week (timed: 20 min)
  • Watch Tom Richey's SCOTUS case playlists for every required case
Weeks 9–12

Phase 3: FRQ Mastery and Quantitative Analysis

  • Practice Quantitative Analysis FRQs with real AP data sets
  • Write one Argument Essay per week using foundational documents as evidence
  • Complete 3 full MC sections (55 questions, 80 min) under timed conditions
  • Review every missed MC question with Prof. Marcus (SofAI chat)
Weeks 13–16

Phase 4: Full Exam Simulation

  • One full timed practice exam per week (80 min MC + 100 min FRQ)
  • Review argument essay grading rubric until you can self-score accurately
  • Memorize Federalist #10, #51, Brutus #1 key quotes for Argument Essay
  • Final review: SCOTUS case connections chart — which units/concepts does each case test?
Official & Curated

AP Resources Hub

🏛
Official Source

CollegeBoard AP Gov

Official course description, exam format, sample FRQs with scoring guidelines, and AP Classroom.

Visit AP Central →
📚
The VR School

VRS AP Resources Center

All VR School AP course resources, study guides, and score submission guidance.

Open AP Resources →
⭐
Student Exemplar

AP Seminar Exemplar by Jiang

See the standard every VRS student aspires to — and the path to getting there.

View Exemplar →
Agentic AI Tutoring

Your Score 5 AI Tutors

Prof. Marcus Webb is your AP Gov expert — every FRQ type, SCOTUS case, foundational document, and scoring rubric. SofAIconnects Government to every other subject you're studying.

✍️ Walk me through how to write a perfect Argument Essay on federalism⚖️ Quiz me on all 15 required SCOTUS cases until I know them cold📜 Help me compare Federalist #10 and Brutus #1 for my essay🏛️ Give me a timed SCOTUS Comparison FRQ and grade my response
🌟 Next Level

Your Government Skills Are an Academic Superpower — Use Them in AP Seminar

AP US Government builds exactly the skills AP Seminar demands: evidence-based argumentation from primary sources, constitutional reasoning, and defending a thesis under pressure. See how Jiang combined rigorous academic skills to build an outstanding portfolio recognized at the national level.

View AP Seminar ExemplarExplore AP Seminar →
🎓
⚖️

Ready to Score a 5 in AP US Government?

Enroll in the most comprehensive, AI-powered AP US Government and Politics course available. WASC accredited. UC A-G Section A approved. Exam: May 2026.

Browse All Courses

WASC Accredited · UC A-G Approved · CollegeBoard Aligned · Exam: May 2026

Financial literacy should belong to everyone

Help California students build money confidence.

Give to the endowment →Open financial literacy hub
VR
The VR School

The world's first accredited Spatial Intelligence school. WASC-accredited. UC A-G approved. 402+ students. 20+ countries.

520 Lasuen Mall #200, Stanford, California, CA 94309
(650) 422 9180
admissions@thevrschool.org
WASC Accredited

Fully Accredited for Grades 6–12 by ACS WASC

Code: 43 46070 999Grades 6–12

World Labs Partner ✦

Spatial Intelligence · Marble · Spark.js

School

  • About Us
  • Staff
  • Accreditation
  • School Profile
  • Endowment
  • Corporate Giving
  • Careers

Programs

  • UC A-G Courses
  • California Personal Finance
  • CVC Dual Enrollment
  • CVC Pathway OS
  • iBuildme
  • iBuildme App
  • iTeachXR LMS
  • AP Seminar Studio
  • Credentials
  • AI Program
  • VR Labs
  • VR Experiences
  • VR Network

Spatial Intelligence

  • Spatial Lab ✦
  • Moonshots TV
  • World Labs Marble ↗
  • The School That Shouldn't Exist
  • Website Evolution Archive
  • Media & Stories
  • VR Explorer

Support

  • Help & Support
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Headset Safety
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 The VR School · All rights reserved · Spatial Intelligence Lab ✦

402+ students · Stanford · Palo Alto · China · Singapore

91% Math · 89% Science · 86% ELA · WASC · UC A-G